Should Maya and Jordan split the $2,400 vet bill for their shared dog evenly, or should Jordan pay more?

Position A

Maya's Position

Maya (proposal author)

Position A is drawn from 1 reply

Maya believes the vet bill should be split evenly, as per their historical agreement, but is open to a slightly uneven split for this bill and revisiting future cost-sharing.

• The vet bill should be split 50/50, consistent with past agreements.
• Both parties agreed to cancel the pet insurance.
• If income-based splits are used, they should apply to all dog expenses.
• Proposes a 55/45 split for this bill and suggests getting new pet insurance.

Fairness check from this side's view: 9/10

The statement accurately reflects Maya's views on splitting the vet bill and her openness to adjusting the split, as well as her desire to revisit future cost-sharing.

Jury: 92 · agreement 100%

Position B

Jordan's Position

Jordan (proposal author)

Position B is drawn from 1 reply

Jordan argues for an uneven split on the vet bill, citing the circumstances of the incident and income disparity, and proposes a new agreement for future expenses.

• The surgery was due to an incident at Jordan's place, and Maya wanted the insurance canceled.
• An even split disproportionately affects Jordan due to lower income.
• Proposes a 60/40 split for this bill and a future agreement for all costs.

Fairness check from this side's view: 9/10

The statement accurately reflects Jordan's arguments and proposal, considering the circumstances and income disparity.

Jury: 98 · agreement 100%

1. Fairness of Cost Distribution

Value question

The core disagreement is whether the vet bill should be split based on historical agreements, circumstances of the incident, or income disparity.