Should Maya and Jordan split the $2,400 vet bill for their shared dog evenly, or should Jordan pay more?
Use the browser print dialog and choose Save as PDF.
Position A: Maya's Position
Fairness 9/10
- The vet bill for Biscuit came to $2,400 after the surgery. We've always split his costs 50/50, so I think we each pay $1,200.
- I suggested canceling it, but you agreed. We both signed off on that. And he could have eaten a sock at either apartment.
- I'm not against helping, but if we move to income-based splits for the dog, that should apply to food and grooming too, not just the bills that are convenient.
- I could do 55/45 on this bill, and I want us to look at getting insurance again so this doesn't happen twice.
Position B: Jordan's Position
Fairness 9/10
- I get that, but the surgery happened because he ate a sock while staying at my place, and you were the one who wanted the premium pet insurance canceled last spring to save $45 a month.
- Sure, but I make about $30k less than you a year. A flat split hits me a lot harder than it hits you.
- That's fair. Maybe we split this one 60/40 with you paying more, and then we sit down and agree on a rule for everything going forward.
The dog ate a sock while staying at Jordan's place.. Consistent 60%
Maya makes approximately $30,000 more per year than Jordan.. Consistent 80%
Bridge Option: 57.5/42.5 Split and Comprehensive Future Plan has the highest minimum acceptability across the positions, at 79.
A suggestion for discussion, not a ruling. Verafy doesn't decide value questions; it shows where the disagreement is and which options each side can live with.